Please Could u Delete a Item that is showing Twice. Item Preview not available. Richard Pascoe. Aug 1, am Aug 1, am. Jul 28, pm Jul 28, pm. Jul 26, am Jul 26, am. Jul 22, am Jul 22, am. Jul 18, am Jul 18, am. Re: delete files. Jul 18, pm Jul 18, pm. Jul 16, am Jul 16, am. Re: Delete some files. Jul 16, pm Jul 16, pm. Re: Delete some items. Jul 17, am Jul 17, am.
Jul 21, am Jul 21, am. Jul 14, pm Jul 14, pm.
The Efficacy of Sacrifice. Correspondences in the Ṛgvedic Brāhmaṇas issue 29
Re: Text Not Processing. Jul 15, pm Jul 15, pm. Delete my bad item please. Jun 16, am Jun 16, am. Re: Delete my bad item please. Thomas Mrett. Jun 13, pm Jun 13, pm. Jun 14, pm Jun 14, pm. Jun 23, am Jun 23, am. Jun 13, am Jun 13, am. How change preview item on archive.
Lubomir Ludvik. May 27, am May 27, am. Re: How change preview item on archive. May 27, pm May 27, pm. How to remove your uploads from archive. May 20, pm May 20, pm. May 14, am May 14, am. Shaw established with Eastern doctrines:. It was Henry Corbin who undertook a thorough research into the notion of a mundus imaginalis clearly present in Persian philosophers and mystics as a middle-realm between the sensible and the intelligible.
According to him, the mundus imaginalis is actually the very place of religious experience and its manifold elements theophanies, visions, eschatological events, etc. The former contains a number of source texts from the pre-Islamic and Islamic period dealing with the question of the subtle dimension of the body. We may conclude by saying that Corbin clearly shows how a phenomenology of mysticism and visions can be traced back to a metaphysical basis founded in the subtle physiology we have referred to throughout this essay.
Notes: 1 A significant example is S. At the same time the identity between the earthly and the resurrected body is explained in terms of the relationship between seed and plant. This opinion is shared in the collective volume edited by G. Samuel and J. It is not surprising that the idea of the subtle body has always aroused particular interest in theosophical circles, and that the only attempt to use this notion in a broader transcultural investigation was carried out by a Theosophist: J.
The Concept of Hylic Pluralism , Cumont, Afterlife in Roman paganism , New Haven , pp. Klein zum Geburtstag, ed. See also I. Culianu, Psychanodia I: a survey of the evidence concerning the ascension of the soul and its relevance , Leiden It is interesting to see a text written in anticipating certain social and religious processes and events that without a doubt have become a problem over the past twenty-five years.
The reader may decide which aspects of the interview can serve as an orientation for the most urgent cultural problems of our century. He has done his utmost to make Indian thought known in the West. Living nowadays in Italy, he occasionally comes to Paris, where we interviewed him. AD: I would say that it was India that left me when it fell into the hands of people who tried to reject their own tradition. It became clear to me that I had nothing else to do there, that it was time to leave the country. AD: No. I could have returned for short sojourns, but what is the point of doing that?
To what purpose should I see that country again from the room of a Hilton or Sheraton hotel, or even become a Hindu once more, just for fifteen days or so? AD: Exactly, right after she the service agent was a woman finished with Gurdjieff she was told to tail me. This woman was responsible for Gurdjieff being barred from Great Britain, but in my case she saved me from prison. After she was given the task of tailing me, a relationship gradually grew up between us. With friends of mine, we had fun removing letters from her name. She was called Juliette, so once it was Jules, another time Iette, or even Uliet.
She even helped me during the Second World War. At that time French nationals were regarded as spies, so the British would have sent me to a concentration camp — of course, a very civilized one, but this woman avoided that. Today you live in Rome, and Italy is also the focus of your last book, Les contes du labyrinthe. The title of your biography was The Way to the Labyrinth.
Do you have the impression that you somehow got lost in it?
- From Sacrifice to the Slaughterhouse.
- Better Body Workouts for Women?
- Polska Bibliografia Naukowa.
- William Edward Soothill.
- The Ghost Mountain Boys: Their Epic March and the Terrifying Battle for New Guinea--The Forgotten War of the South Pacific.
Or have you found a way out of that Labyrinth? AD: Quite the contrary. I am right inside it. It was a halt where Etruscan pilgrims stopped on their way to the temple of Praeneste dedicated to the goddess, whose priestess was the sibyl Vegoia. Elsewhere, in Les contes du labyrinthe , you refer to artwork as a means of approaching the gods. In the Indian texts, it says that aestheticism gives pleasure to the eye.
There are other feelings as well. Ultimately, perception of the divine seems to me a profound sensation and experience of the supernatural. Does the problem lie in the fact that the monotheistic God is not manifest whereas a god should always be manifest? AD: Monotheistic religions worship a vague and unreal entity. Instead of perceiving the multiplicity of worlds, they reduce the world to a kind of company director without employees.
This simplification leads to the absurdity of amalgamating a human image with an unknowable principle. That is a remarkable muddle. Nowadays we are witnessing a very dangerous time when the pyres of the inquisition are being lighted once more. People are burned because of their opinions. On my own rather humble level, I try to express the conception of life that I learned in India.
This leads me to say, for example, that the gods are an unquestionable reality. It suffices to look for them in order to find them. AD: Try to feel the inner life of things. If you start realising that there are forces behind plants, climates, animals and minerals, you will discover that a kind of consciousness orders all things, and you may finally even become acquainted with it. In order to find the gods, you have to worship them through their creations, their images and their symbols. One of the first steps is without a doubt going into a deep forest to revitalize and get closer to the realities of nature.
Those who do that today are few and far between. AD: It is a matter of sensitivity. A sacred place is one where you perceive a certain presence and where you feel good. Some special places are sacred due to particular manifestations there. It is remarkable that a sacred place preserves its character from one religion to another. Most of them are quite well-known, perhaps even too well-known…. AD: Absolutely. It is a serious matter when knowledge is conveyed to unprepared persons under inappropriate conditions. It is impossible to instruct the whole world on that level, and this trend indicates a dark future.
Nowadays we witness a dangerous proliferation of fake gurus. Lots of people of good faith fall into the hands of unprepared individuals preaching the most extravagant practices, and simultaneously worrying about what they are going to do that very evening or the day after. That is not serious at all.
French seekers would get as much of the divine in the depths of the forest of Saint Germain as they would in any place in India, and perhaps even more so, because it is a place they feel familiar with, it is part of their own universe. I was interested in music and little by little I discovered a prodigious civilization. Much later I left India simply because I was told that I would be much more use explaining the Hindu tradition to the rest of the world. The tradition of India is fundamental, because it is the only tradition of the ancient world that has remained alive.
But as I said, it is not essential to go so far, because if you feel destined for the religious life, the divine reality is present wherever you are. In the meanwhile, just communicate with things and seek essential values wherever you are, whether in the forest or on the mountain. Perception of profound realities arises from contemplation of the beauty of the world, of an inner transformation, produced by this change in looking at reality.
In other words, have you met Westerners who are authentically and profoundly religious? AD: Religions are one of the most foolish inventions of the human race. They belong to the domain of the absurd. Fortunately we can be religious in spite of religions. The religious impulse is in the first place a personal search: we have to worship the creator through his tangible creation.
In this sense, all research leading to a deeper comprehension of nature and the beauty of the world is a personal experience and at the same time a religious one. The wonder of the artist, the discoveries of the scientist, the experience of pleasure, aesthetics, all that is religion. You can call it Shaivism, Dionysism, Mithraism or otherwise. After all, the name is not essential.
Shiva, Dionysos, Mithras are aspects of the same principle, whose symbols, feasts and rites reveal the unity of a very ancient heritage. I have found in Shaivism signs common to all other religions. Only their myths and symbols differ.
One of the main principles in India is to resist any form of proselytism, because it is impossible to indicate a path that suits all people. In the first place it is impossible because not everyone is at the same level of spiritual development. We have to give up dogmas and fixed structures, although that does not mean giving up all beliefs and not having any guiding principles.
For Hindus, the swastika expresses this very idea. The central point of the swastika stands for fundamental and intangible unity, but its approach is not direct, because human beings are incapable of reaching that unity, and if they rigidly follow such unitarian logic, they get lost. So we have to know where to stop. AD: In a certain way, yes.
In fact, the monks of many orders tend to forget the second aspect. Contemplation is something that belongs to the last phase of life, and there is also the question: Contemplation of what? This fundamental point is usually ignored because in most cases people have been unable to discover and understand life and the world. Why do Shaivites try to halt what according to their conception is inevitable? AD: In the first place because we can always postpone a deadline, but most important of all because the attempt should prepare us for survival.
The end of a cycle does not mean the last cycle and therefore the end of humanity. There will once again be a golden age, and we can try to take a certain number of things with us. AD: The music of Schubert, the paintings of Turner. That would be wonderful! More seriously: we must always cherish the hope that something will remain of this universe. AD: The principles they represent are immortal, it is only their personification that is mortal.
On the contrary, one would tend to imagine a vegetarian, who respects nature. Some years ago, you shocked Jacques Chancel when you declared that there are wars because human sacrifice was forbidden, that sacrifice is indispensable. AD: Yes, that is true. We have to offer the gods the best we have, and it is possible to destroy life out of love. Life is, by the dynamics of nature, nothing more than destruction. Just open your eyes and look at the world. It is all life and death, alternating perpetually, ineluctably. Above all, we must not replace eternal laws with sentimental ideas.
Dying may be sad, but it is necessary and contributes to the order and thus to the beauty of the world. Reducing religion to morality is generally speaking an obstacle to knowledge of the universe, but that is the problem with religions that focus exclusively on human beings instead of understanding the totality of the universe.
AD: Perhaps I am. The worst sin of human beings is arrogance.
If we found a moral law going beyond man, we could come closer to reality as it is. But we have always tended to focus only on human society and to fence it off from the rest of the universe by means of rules against nature. That is the main problem with religions nowadays. How does an ecologist like you react to that fact?
An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.
AD: India is in a crisis imposed by a social, religious and political system that is contrary to its spirit. For those who really know India, however, all that is very superficial. There have always been and will always be people who build up terrible destructive forces, just as there are wise men who lose their sense of responsibility. This also happens in very traditional societies, even in the Golden Age — which is what ushers in the second age. AD: The sun is the centre of everything in Mithraism — not only the culmination, but also the source.
Human knowledge is limited, but these limits can be surpassed and we can then discover a hidden reality: the ancient gods are in this sense a reality, they never went away. Today certain branches of science are attempting once more to reach the fundamental cosmological principles, and action is gradually being reconnected with knowledge.
In the ancient world, Christianity replaced Mithraism; it has taken over a world conception that was universal. Jesus Christ is a very agreeable figure and his message of love very appealing. But this message was distorted afterwards. Have you considered that the origins of European tradition are regarded as oral?
Do you confront oral and written tradition? AD: Written tradition poses a problem. It is a dangerous phenomenon. In India, for example, written transmission is relatively recent, and stress is laid on what has been heard and remembered. It is dangerous to regard any written form as truth. Writing is destructive: for example, in Africa, there are brilliant people, but their knowledge is considered useless because of their oral tradition.
So only those whose knowledge is very restricted but who know how to write have access to important functions. There is a terrifying form of superstition and imperialistic policy related to writing. The religions of the book were established according to the notions of a certain period, but with time they became distorted and lapsed, of course.
The Hindus say that language is formed in four degrees: first, one has an idea; second, one finds a form for this idea; then one circumscribes it with approximate words; and, lastly, one expresses the sound and the word. If we return to the origin of the word, we tend to reach the universal. Do you think that the modern world is likely to understand the true message of astrology, beyond all its mystifications?
AD: We are part of one of the cells in this universe with all its planets, and all the structures of this whole are found in everything the universe contains.here
Erice Kiarostami: Correspondences - PDF Free Download
Time is divided into cycles, which for humanity are four. Each one of these ages is in its turn divided into four parts and so on and so forth. From macrocosm to microcosm, everything mirrors the same structures. It would be illusory and even dangerous if what affects the upper levels were not to affect the lower in the same way. It is interesting therefore to delve into this kind of relationship. We should, as usual, be careful not to fall into any kind of dogmatism, and that is the real problem. Astrology might be an aid, and we should try to understand its laws. But who can claim to understand all these laws and is capable of imposing them on other individuals?
It is this slipping of astrology into religion and its petrification that turns out to be dangerous. Have you achieved the goal of your existence? Is there anything you regret? AD: I was interested in music, and that was the first thing that attracted me to India: the musical aspect of its culture. But I spent my life shifting from one subject to another, finding connections between different domains, and I enriched myself with each acquisition in order to deepen the focus of my research.
Each time I attained relative proficiency in an art, I had to abandon it: piano, singing, Indian music, painting and other forms of artistic expression. I could have made a profession out of each one of them, but I was destined to be something else because each time I was sidetracked from my object of study and research. In this sense, I have some regrets, yes. But it is insignificant when I see everything I have done and how important this experience has been for me. AD: I have no right to do so, and that was the condition on which I received what I learned.
I belong to a caste that cannot teach. He too received teachings from an Indian master when he was young. After that he took himself for a prophet, which is why his school is mediocre. He also attempted to bridge East and West and was very interested in subjects quite close to yours, such as Tantric yoga.
AD: Many aspects and intuitions of Evola are stimulating, but everything written in Western languages is alien to me. For contributions, please contact: communication find. This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: Password:. Dancing figure expressing the rhythms of creation, photo by Aleksandra Wenta.
The Labyrinth at Zagarolo, where the gods still live, photo by Sarah Eichner. Henri Frederic Amiel.
An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.
It has no sound or touch, no appearance, taste, or smell; it is without beginning or end, undecaying and eternal. When a man perceives it, fixed and beyond the immense, he is freed from the jaws of death. Hidden in all beings, this self is not visibly displayed. The self-existent One pierced the apertures outward, therefore, one looks out, and not into oneself. A certain wise men in search of immortality, turned his sight inward and saw the self within. Thinking or thought is subordinated as a means to the end of perception.
The seer of the seeing is actually the seeing [itself]; it perpetually sees the seeing, for never is seeing not seen by the seer. Here the seeing of the seer must be perpetual. If the seeing of the seer were transitory, then the seeing which is [the object]seen, might sometimes not be seen; just as something like a pot would not [always] be [seen]by transitory vision.
But the seer of the seeing never ceases to see the seeing like that… 6. The Self is the Dancer. The stage which is the body is the inner Self. The senses are the spectators of his dancing. As he can manifest Freedom in his own body, so can he elsewhere. Dancing troupes, photo by Aleksandra Wenta.
- Processing and Properties of Advanced Ceramics and Composites VI: Ceramic Transactions?
- The Failure of Economic Diplomacy: Britain, Germany, France and the United States, 1931–36!
- Computational Methods in Engineering & Science!
When we have these daemonic and divine visions, we do not hear with our sensible ears, nor do we see with our sensory organs of the face and the eyes, but, since there are more originary, more exemplary and more purified perceptions in the spirit, we hear and see the divine manifestations with our pneumatic organs.